PROP ⇒ MMS (Additive Valuations, Complete Allocations)
Theorem. Let $w$ be an additive valuation, allGoods the outer
good set, and $A$ a proportional allocation
([[social_choice.fair_division.indivisible.proportional]]) under
$w.\mathrm{toValuation}$. Then $A$ satisfies the maximin-share guarantee
([[social_choice.fair_division.indivisible.maximin_share]]).
In Lean: SocialChoice.FairDivision.Indivisible.IsProportional.isMaxminShare.
Proof
(by contradiction)
Fix an agent $i$ and an alternative complete allocation $B$. Suppose for contradiction that no bundle of $B$ has value $\le v_i(A(i))$ from agent $i$'s perspective. By linear ordering on $\mathbb{R}$, $\forall j,\ v_i(A(i)) < v_i(B(j))$.
By Finset.sum_lt_sum (using the strict inequality at least once for
the nonempty population), the constant sum strictly beats the
$B$-sum:
$$
|N| \cdot v_i(A(i)) = \sum_{j} v_i(A(i)) < \sum_{j} v_i(B(j)).
$$
By additivity of $w$ and the cover property of $B$: $$ \sum_{j} v_i(B(j)) = v_i(\mathrm{allGoods}). $$
Combining with proportionality of $A$ ([[social_choice.fair_division.indivisible.ef_implies_proportional_additive]] or equivalently the hypothesis here): $$ v_i(\mathrm{allGoods}) \le |N| \cdot v_i(A(i)). $$
Chaining gives $|N| \cdot v_i(A(i)) < |N| \cdot v_i(A(i))$, a contradiction. Hence some bundle of $B$ does satisfy the MMS inequality. $\square$
Significance
This is the last link in the additive-valuations chain $\mathrm{EF} \Rightarrow \mathrm{PROP} \Rightarrow \mathrm{MMS}$. Combined with [[social_choice.fair_division.indivisible.efx_implies_ef1]] and [[social_choice.fair_division.indivisible.ef_implies_efx_mono]], it gives the full chain $\mathrm{EF} \Rightarrow \mathrm{EFX} \Rightarrow \mathrm{EF1} \Rightarrow \mathrm{PROP} \Rightarrow \mathrm{MMS}$ for additive valuations on complete allocations.
Note the converse $\mathrm{MMS} \Rightarrow \mathrm{PROP}$ does not hold in general (MMS is strictly weaker than PROP).
References
- [AGT Chapter 11] Nisan, Roughgarden, Tardos, and Vazirani, Algorithmic Game Theory. PROP–MMS implication.
- Budish, E. (2011). "The Combinatorial Assignment Problem". J. Pol. Econ.
- Bouveret, Chevaleyre, and Maudet (2016). "Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods", COMSOC Handbook Ch. 12.