Theorem Reserve Second-Price Truth-Telling Is Dominant
theorem proved

Reserve Second-Price Truth-Telling Is Dominant

For every reserve price, truthful bidding is a weakly dominant strategy in the reserve second-price auction ([[mechanism_design.auction.basic.reserve_second_price_mechanism]]).

Formally, for valuation profile \(v : I \to U\), bidder \(i\), and bid profile \(b\), replacing bidder \(i\)'s bid by \(v_i\) weakly increases bidder \(i\)'s utility: \[ u_i(v,b) \le u_i(v,b[i \mapsto v_i]). \]

Lean form

  • utility_nonneg proves that truthful bidding gives nonnegative payoff.
  • valuation_is_dominant proves the direct utility inequality.
  • truthful_weakly_dominant packages the same result as IsWeaklyDominant in the induced strategic game.
  • mechanism_isDSIC lifts the theorem to the MechanismWithTransfers.isDSIC predicate.
Proof

idea

The proof is the Vickrey dominance argument with one extra threshold. Bidder i's own bid does not change the highest bid among opponents, so the critical price faced by i is the maximum of the reserve and the highest opposing bid. Truthful bidding wins exactly when \(v_i\) clears that threshold; in the winning case the payoff is nonnegative, and in the losing case the payoff is zero.

References

  • [AGT, Chapter 9, Section 9.3] Nisan, Roughgarden, Tardos, and Vazirani, Algorithmic Game Theory.
  • [Krishna, Chapter 2] Vijay Krishna, Auction Theory, 2nd ed..
  • [Vickrey 1961] William Vickrey, "Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders", Journal of Finance 16(1):8-37.

Also in