Reserve Second-Price Truth-Telling Is Dominant
For every reserve price, truthful bidding is a weakly dominant strategy in the reserve second-price auction ([[mechanism_design.auction.basic.reserve_second_price_mechanism]]).
Formally, for valuation profile \(v : I \to U\), bidder \(i\), and bid profile \(b\), replacing bidder \(i\)'s bid by \(v_i\) weakly increases bidder \(i\)'s utility: \[ u_i(v,b) \le u_i(v,b[i \mapsto v_i]). \]
Lean form
utility_nonnegproves that truthful bidding gives nonnegative payoff.valuation_is_dominantproves the direct utility inequality.truthful_weakly_dominantpackages the same result asIsWeaklyDominantin the induced strategic game.mechanism_isDSIClifts the theorem to theMechanismWithTransfers.isDSICpredicate.
Proof
idea
The proof is the Vickrey dominance argument with one extra threshold. Bidder
i's own bid does not change the highest bid among opponents, so the critical
price faced by i is the maximum of the reserve and the highest opposing bid.
Truthful bidding wins exactly when \(v_i\) clears that threshold; in the winning
case the payoff is nonnegative, and in the losing case the payoff is zero.
References
- [AGT, Chapter 9, Section 9.3] Nisan, Roughgarden, Tardos, and Vazirani, Algorithmic Game Theory.
- [Krishna, Chapter 2] Vijay Krishna, Auction Theory, 2nd ed..
- [Vickrey 1961] William Vickrey, "Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders", Journal of Finance 16(1):8-37.