Lemma Myerson Payment Envelope Lemmas
lemma proved

Myerson Payment Envelope Lemmas

Two technical lemmas central to Myerson's envelope-theorem argument for single-parameter mechanisms.

payment_sandwich

For a DSIC single-parameter mechanism with allocation rule $x$ and payments $p$, the payment $p_i(b)$ at bid $b$ is sandwiched between the upper and lower integral bounds determined by $x_i$: $$ \int_0^{b_i} x_i(z, b_{-i}) \, dz \;\le\; p_i(b) - p_i(b_0) \;\le\; \int_0^{b_i} x_i(z, b_{-i}) \, dz $$ where $b_0$ is the zero-bid reference. The collapsed equality is the Myerson payment formula ([[mechanism_design.myerson.payment_formula]]).

payment_difference_bound

A Lipschitz-style bound on the payment difference between two bids: $$ |p_i(b) - p_i(b')| \;\le\; \int \big|x_i(z, b_{-i}) - x_i(z, b'_{-i})\big| \, dz, $$ controlling how the payment moves when the bid profile changes.

Where these are used

  • Implementability proof (withMyersonPayment_isDSIC_of_isMonotone, in [[mechanism_design.myerson.monotonicity_characterization]]): uses payment_sandwich to verify the Myerson-payment-attached mechanism satisfies DSIC.
  • Payment-formula recovery (payment_formula_of_isDSIC_of_zeroNormalized, in [[mechanism_design.myerson.payment_formula]]): uses payment_difference_bound to show that any DSIC zero-normalised payment equals the Myerson integral.

These are the technical mid-steps in the envelope-theorem derivation of the Myerson characterisation.

References

  • [AGT Chapter 9, §9.5.4, Thm 9.36] Nisan, Roughgarden, Tardos, and Vazirani, Algorithmic Game Theory. Envelope characterisation of single-parameter DSIC mechanisms.
  • Myerson, R. B. (1981). "Optimal Auction Design". Math. Oper. Res. 6: 58–73. Original envelope-theorem framing.

Used by

Also in